2014考研英语二阅读text3真题及答案

Text 3
The concept of man versus machineis at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends tobe most acutely felt during economic downturns and fragile recoveries. And yet,it would be a mistake to think we are right now simply experiencing the painfulside of a boom and bust cycle. Certain jobs have gone away for eating up humanjobs, this phenomenon will continue to restructure our economy in ways we can’timmediately foresee.
When there is exponential improvement in theprice and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be immunefrom automation suddenly become threatened. This argument has attracted a lotof attention, via the success of the book Race Against the Machine, byErik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, whoboth hail from MITs Center for Digital Business.
Centerfor Digital Business.
This is a powerful argument, and a scaryone. And yet, John Hagel, auther of The power of pull and other books, saysBrynjolfsson and McAfee miss the reason why these jobs are so vulnerable totechnology in the first place.
Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S.that tend to be “tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave noroom for “individual initiative or creativity.” In short, these are the typesof jobs that machines can perform much better at than human beings. That is howwe have put a giant target sign on the backs of American workers, Hagel says.
It’s time to reinvent the formula for howwork is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th centurynotion of work, Hagel says. In our rapidly changing economy, we more than everneed people in the workplace who can take initiative and exercise theirimagination “to respond to unexpected events.” That’s not something machinesare good at. They are designed to perform very predictable activities.
As Hagel notes, Brynjolfsson and McAfeeindeed touched on this point in their book. We need to reframe race against themachine as race with the machine. In our works, we need to look at the ways inwhich machines can augment human labor rather than replace it. So then theproblem is not really about technology, but rather, “how do we innovate ourinstitutions and our work practices?”
31.According to the first paragraph, economic downturns would .
[A] easethe competition of man vs. machine
[B]highlight machines’ threat to human jobs
[C]provoke a painful technological revolution
[D]outmode our current economic structure
选B . 细节题，定位在第一句话The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as theindustrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturnsand fragile recoveries.
对象是 man vs human 答案一定要讲到machine 与human jobs 排除C D.
AB 正好相反，选B .
文章说现象在经济衰退和脆弱复苏是更加急剧。选B
32. Theauthors of Race Against the Machine argue that .
[A]technology is diminishing man’s job opportunities
[B]automation is accelerating technological development
[C]certain jobs will remain intact after automation
[D] manwill finally win the race against machine
选A. 细节题，容易，
答案定位在第一句：When there is exponential improvement in the price and performanceof technology, jobs that were once thought to be immune from automationsuddenly become threatened.
段落话题是工作与自动化，机器的关系排除B D.
A C方向相反，一定选工作不利的选项选A.
33. Hagelargues that jobs in the U.S. are often .
[A]performed by innovative minds
[B]scripted with an individual style
[C]standardized without a clear target
[D]designed against human creativity
选D. 细节题，如果不仔细定位，容易出错，定位在第一句话：
对象是creativity ，而且与之相悖。
最大干扰项选C. 错在定位信息没有 clear target这个对象，
Target出现在第三句话中，也可以通过非定位信息排除法排除
Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be“tightly scripted” and “highly standardized” ones that leave no room for“individual initiative or creativity.”
34.According to the last paragraph, Brynjolfsson and McAfee discussed .
[A] thepredictability of machine behavior in practice
[B] theformula for how work is conducted efficiently
[C] theways machines replace human labor in modern times
[D]thenecessity of human involvement in the workplace
选D. 细节题，用排除法才能做对。不过正确选项和原文同义改写的不是很好。
定位在最后一句话：So then the problem is not really about technology, but rather, “howdo we innovate our institutions and our work practices?”,
作者否定了technology 排除A ,B
而C是rather than 后面的内容。
选D
35. Whichof the following could be the most appropriate title for text?
[A]How toInnovate Our Work Practices
[B]Machineswill Replace Human Labor
[C]Can WeWin the Race Against Machines
[D]EconomicDownturns Stimulate Innovations
选C . 主旨题，排除法做对，否则很容易做错。
文章主题 machine 排除A D .
剩下 B C,
排除B machine会代替人非文章观点。

————文章来源上海华是学院，里面有整套，这是我摘下来的一部分。

2014年考研英语二比2013年难吗

1、2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。

2、尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。

2014奥鹏中国医科大学开放英语2答案

我在线 看能不能帮到你

2014年考研英语二国家线大概是多少，我这份还有希...

河海大学不是34所自主划线的学校，走国家线，属于一区A类考生，虽然你考的是专业学位，但是这几年英语二和英语一一样，一般在40分左右，所以你的分数很悬，在这岩上，你总分很高，建议你两手准备，一方面密切专注国家线，如果能去复试，希望很大，另一方面重点搜一下可以调剂的二区学校，你的总分很高，上二区学校调剂他们的很愿意要的，祝好运！

扩展

想和你深聊一下可否告知一下qq
用大写

补充

好的，690924932

英语二难度怎么样。

2014年我参加了英语二考试，就2014年英语二的难度我认为，完型比一稍微简单容易把握，但并不简单多少；新题型比一简单，但2014有变难趋势，与一主要题型不同，主要考选标题和细节7选5；对于作文大作文比一少了5分，主题好把握应该不会跑题，但不好得高分，小作文总体差不多；最主要是阅读，不要说二简单多少，考察形式不同，虽然超纲词比一少，选项也短，但是这都不是他要考的方面，主要是考文章理解，英语一的选项是难，但考同义替换比较多，选项规律性强，不好论谁简单。不要听外面人说英语二简单就信了，13年和以前的还算比较简单，但2014难度有所提升，因为才有英语二没几年，还没有完全定型，估计15的难度也不会降低多少，不要大意，也不要完全按照英语一的套路做英语二，不太适用。你要相信教育部那帮傻叉天天没事就研究怎么给你挖坑，不会让你那么好过的。